Toggle menu
Show all news


Kama Melly QC appointed Middle Temple’s member of the Board of Governors of the Inns of Court College of Advocacy…


PSQB’s annual Criminal Seminar at Aspire on 10 October – postponed


Caroline Wood and John Boumphrey present Zoom seminar on Wasted Costs.

Christopher Boxall

Fixed Recoverable Costs: No advocacy – No fee! Christopher Boxall discusses

Christopher Boxall discusses the first instance decision in Crawshaw v Alfred Dunhill Limited (County Court Sheffield, 16.11.2017 before District Judge Bellamy).


The Claimant suffered injury by tripping over unmarked cabling at a golf tournament. There was an application for pre-action disclosure relating to (amongst other information) the contract between Alfred Dunhill and IMG Ltd. However, voluntary disclosure was made, removing the need for a hearing.

The claim was eventually notified on the portal and settled, save for the narrow issue of the cost of the application for pre-action disclosure. In short, is a Claimant entitled to recover ‘advocates costs’ if no advocacy is provided?

The Rules

Fixed Recoverable Costs apply to the costs of pre-action disclosure applications (Sharp v Leeds City Council [2017] EWCA Civ 233).

CPR 45.29H (1) limits fixed costs of interim applications to a sum equivalent to ‘one half of the applicable Type A and Type B costs in Table 6 or 6A.’

CPR 45.18(2) defines Type A fixed costs as the legal representative’s costs. Type B costs relate to the ‘advocate’s costs’. Both costs are fixed at £250.

The Decision

The court held that the Claimant was not entitled to recover Type B ‘advocates costs’ since no advocacy had been conducted or required.

In reaching the above decision, District Judge Bellamy found merit in the following points:

  • The costs of the legal representative and the advocate were separated under the fixed costs regime by intention. It was clearly not intended that there would be a single fixed fee to cover both parties;
  • The separation of the advocacy fee serves as an incentive for parties to settle prior to a hearing;
  • The word ‘applicable’ in CPR 45.29H made clear that Type A and B costs were not automatically recoverable in every case.


The above ruling may seem like a logical and common-sense approach – because it is. Although a first instance decision, it is persuasive and will be a useful tool for practitioners who are opposing claims for advocacy fees in cases where no advocacy was required.

Christopher Boxall is a member of the personal injury and costs teams at Park Square Barristers. He deals with a wide range of personal injury (PI) claims including road-traffic accidents, occupiers’ liability claims and Highways Act cases

Contact Christopher’s clerks

Francine Kirk on 0113 202 8605

Jordan Millican on 0113 213 5207

This article is available to download.