Andrew has been in practice for over 25 years and chose to practise exclusively in Criminal Law from a very early stage. Over the years he has developed a wide-ranging practise, and is instructed to both prosecute and defend cases, at all levels .
He has significant experience of defending and prosecuting complex allegations of dishonesty, those relating to both importation and distribution of drugs, together with cases involving firearms and arson, murder and serious violence, rape and serious sexual offending. To this end, he has also been admitted onto the prosecution RASSO panel( Rape and Serious Sexual Offending).
Andrew has conducted many trials involving allegations made by child victims. He is well familiar with the specialist advocacy required in such cases, and has undertaken recent trials using the s28 pilot scheme, with pre-recorded cross-examination of vulnerable child witnesses.
Andrew is an accomplished and intuitive advocate and benefits from an ability to maintain a flexible approach. He has built up a particular specialism in dealing with Children and Young Offenders, usually but not exclusively who have been sent to the Crown Court upon allegations of Grave offences, or when jointly charged with an Adult.
Andrew also has a wealth of experience and a clear understanding of the dynamics of Multi-Defendant cases. He fully recognises the delicate balance that can sometimes be required to robustly, but sensitively cross-examine witnesses and Co-defendants alike.
Andrew prides himself on a detailed working knowledge of the increasingly complex legislation and case-law in relation to both criminal procedure and current and past sentencing guidelines. He is trained in Forensic Accountancy and his years of experience has allowed him to develop a honed and effective approach to the cross-examination of a wide range of medical and forensic experts.
He is however always conscious that a pragmatic approach will usually be the most helpful approach, both in terms of advice upon strength of the case and advice on plea and sentence.
Andrew is known for a clear and concise approach and for a very thorough understanding of the brief. He is therefore in a position to engage at an early stage of the trial process, to include both conferences and written advices. He will always provide proper consideration to all Interlocutory applications, applications for Dismissal and applications to Stay proceedings, as appropriate. Andrew similarly makes a point of providing Instructing Solicitors with early tactical advice for matters that will run to trial.
As a Grade 3 prosecutor, Andrew has a well-established prosecution practice and has experience of prosecuting multi-handed conspiracies together with offences involving allegations of fraud, violence and organised drug-dealing. He has also prosecuted for government departments, including HMRC and the Department of Work and Pensions.
- R v KH (2017) – Lead by QC to represent Defendant charged with a multi-handed Conspiracy to Murder. The case revolved around meticulous preparation of provable links between defendants from extensive served and unused cell-site evidence. The prosecution persuaded to accept a significantly lessor charge.
- RvRV (2018)- Defence of male accused of systematic grooming and subsequent rape and sexual abuse of child. This case required a need to deal with intimate and distressing evidence, whilst maintaining a robust yet sensitive approach.
- RvSS (2018)- Defence of vulnerable epileptic father charged with repeated Grievous Bodily Harm occasioned to his own child. Consideration of potential defence of Insanity and automatism. After cross-examination of several eminent Crown medical experts, the jury acquitted.
- RvKL (2018)- Defence of Mother of very limited IQ charged with cruelty upon her own child over years. Defendant required Intermediary for the duration of trial, which resulted in acquittal.
- RvJH (2018)- Defence upon charge of Attempt to Endanger Life by Criminal Damage. Defendant had to be managed when suffering significant mental health issues. Ultimately psychiatrist assessed him as unfit to plead. Finding of Fact hearing ultimately lead to Mental Health Act disposal.